[Bug 492259] Review Request: tucan - Manager for downloads and uploads at hosting sites

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Apr 29 06:30:40 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492259


Parag AN(पराग) <panemade at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |panemade at gmail.com
               Flag|                            |fedora-review+




--- Comment #10 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade at gmail.com>  2009-04-29 02:30:38 EDT ---

Review:
+ package builds in mock (rawhide i586).
koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1327590
+ rpmlint output for SRPM and for RPM
tucan.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency librsvg2
==> looks false message
+ source files match upstream url
21cc03fe952da8a0ae44ba66956a0766  tucan-0.3.6.tar.gz
+ package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written
+ Spec file is written in American English.
+ Spec file is legible.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
+ license is open source-compatible.
+ License text is included in package.
+ %doc is present.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ %clean is present.
+ package installed properly.
+ Macro use appears rather consistent.
+ no headers or static libraries.
+ no .pc file present.
+ no -devel subpackage
+ no .la files.
+ translations are available
+ Does owns the directories it creates.
+ no scriptlets present.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ tucan desktop file installed correctly.
+ GUI App.

APPROVED.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list