[Bug 515143] Review Request: mtkbabel - Program to Operate the i-Blue 747 GPS Data Logger

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Aug 3 12:54:12 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515143


Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




--- Comment #8 from Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov at gmail.com>  2009-08-03 08:54:11 EDT ---
I "sponsored" you. Don't hesitate to contact me directly via xmpp or email (
lemenkov at gmail.com ) for any question regarding rules of slightly complex
role-playing game, named "Fedora package maintainership"

REVIEW:

+ rpmlint is silent

[petro at Workplace Desktop]$ rpmlint mtkbabel-0.8-1.fc11.noarch.rpm 
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
[petro at Workplace Desktop]$ 

+ The package is named according to the  Package Naming Guidelines .
+ The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec .
+ The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. 
+ The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the
Licensing Guidelines .
+ The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
+ The file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package, is included
in %doc.
+ The spec file is written in American English.
+ The spec file for the package is legible.
+ The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.

[petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ sha256sum mtkbabel-0.8.tar.gz*
591597c0787822c9fd56c7a3da214e81edd3c98f32d16858221e02dfc0f63779 
mtkbabel-0.8.tar.gz
591597c0787822c9fd56c7a3da214e81edd3c98f32d16858221e02dfc0f63779 
mtkbabel-0.8.tar.gz.1
[petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$

+ The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
primary architecture.

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1575556


+ The package owns all directories that it creates.
+ The package does not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files
listings.
+ Permissions on files are set properly.
+ The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT). 

- The package must consistently use macros. So, I advice you to change "rm -rf
%{buildroot}" to "rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT" in the %install section.

+ The package contains code, or permissible content.
+ Anything, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the
application.
+ The package does not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
+ At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
+ All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.

Please make a last change mentioned above regarding simultaneous using of
%{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT (easyfix). Fix it and proceed with the
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CVS_admin_requests 

Please, also use 


This package is


APPROVED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list