[Bug 516906] Review Request: frePPLe - Free Production Planning Library
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Aug 12 07:23:48 UTC 2009
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516906
Martin Gieseking <martin.gieseking at uos.de> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |martin.gieseking at uos.de
--- Comment #1 from Martin Gieseking <martin.gieseking at uos.de> 2009-08-12 03:23:47 EDT ---
Hello Johan,
since this seems to be your first review request and I can't find you in the
Fedora account system, you need a sponsor reviewing this package. To find one,
add the FE-NEEDSPONSOR tag in the Blocks field above. For further information
see
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Create_Your_Review_Request
I just had a quick look at your spec file and noticed a couple of things to
fix:
- please remove the leading header comment
- the License tag should probably be LGPLv2+ (see the license abbreviation
page)
- fix the Source tags according to
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL
- remove "python" from Requires, as it's determined automatically
- you probably don't need to add the autotools to BuildRequires
- add a %changelog section at the bottom of the spec file showing the revision
history
$ rpm -qlp frepple-0.7.1-1.fc12.src.rpm
frepple-0.7.1.spec
frepple-0.7.1.tar.gz
The spec filename must be frepple.spec (remove the version number).
$ rpmlint frepple-0.7.1-1.fc12.src.rpm
frepple.src: E: no-changelogname-tag
frepple.src: W: invalid-license LGPL, v2.1
frepple.src: W: invalid-license greater
frepple.src: E: invalid-spec-name
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 2 warnings.
Again, the complete review must be done by a sponsor. :)
Martin
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list