[Bug 478372] Review request: Mathgl - Scientific plotting library.

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478372





--- Comment #26 from D Haley <mycae at yahoo.com>  2009-08-14 23:33:52 EDT ---
SPEC URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/mathgl-1.9-4.spec
SRPM URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/mathgl-1.9-4.fc10.src.rpm


Koji Builds:
F10:http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1606818
F11:http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1606824


RPMLint:
$ cat files
Wrote: /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/SRPMS/mathgl-1.9-4.fc10.src.rpm
Wrote: /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/mathgl-1.9-4.fc10.i386.rpm
Wrote: /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/mathgl-devel-1.9-4.fc10.i386.rpm
Wrote: /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/mathgl-doc-1.9-4.fc10.noarch.rpm
Wrote: /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/mathgl-debuginfo-1.9-4.fc10.i386.rpm

$ rpmlint `cat files | sed 's/Wrote: //' | tr '\n' '\ '`
mathgl.i386: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libmgl-glut.so.5.0.0
exit at GLIBC_2.0
mathgl-devel.i386: W: no-documentation
5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.


$ sudo rpm -i ../RPMS/i386/mathgl-1.9-4.fc10.i386.rpm 
[sudo] password for makerpm: 
rpmlint mathgl
skipping line
skipping line
skipping line
$ rpmlint mathgl
mathgl.i386: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libmgl-qt.so.5.0.0
/lib/libpthread.so.0
mathgl.i386: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libmgl.so.5.0.0
/usr/lib/libgomp.so.1
mathgl.i386: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libmgl.so.5.0.0
/usr/lib/libgslcblas.so.0
mathgl.i386: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libmgl-glut.so.5.0.0
exit at GLIBC_2.0
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.

These unused-direct-shlibs are simply -config extras, which I believe can be
ignored.


>For a good model on how to do it properly, look at Octave Forge, the package
>containing additional tools for Octave:

Octave packaging is done. pkg.m is not fun to work with :(. Note that I must
manually use the -1.9.0 versioning as this is what octave searches for (you can
see it from an strace, or by tracing the undocumented pkg.m file).

>If you have defined the macro correctly, it is
>expanded and you don't get such an error.  

I am unclear why

%global octave_api %(octave-config -p API_VERSION || echo 0)

is invalid. In any case, I have switched it to use the conditional.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.