[Bug 478372] Review request: Mathgl - Scientific plotting library.

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sat Aug 15 13:57:37 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478372





--- Comment #32 from Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola at iki.fi>  2009-08-15 09:57:36 EDT ---
rpmlint output:
mathgl.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libmgl-glut.so.5.0.0
exit at GLIBC_2.2.5
mathgl-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.

These should be OK.


MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a
duplicate. OK

MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used
consistently. ~OK
- Please move the buildroot tag somewhere else from the middle of
BuildRequires. I prefer the order: BuildRoot, BuildRequires, Requires.
- Devel package does not contain static libraries, remove them from the
summary.

MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK
MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK
MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the 
Licensing Guidelines. OK

MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license.
NEEDSWORK
- License is GPLv2+ not GPLv3.

MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL. OK
MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK
MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. N/A
MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK
MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. OK

MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package
that owns the directory. NEEDSWORK
- The package needs to own
 %{_datadir}/%{name}/
instead of just
 %{_datadir}/%{name}/fonts/*.vfm

MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK
MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. OK
MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK
MUST: Clean section exists. OK
MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK

MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect
runtime of application. NEEDSWORK
- Add COPYING, COPYRIGHT, NEWS, TODO.

MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. OK
MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A
MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A
MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files
ending in .so must go in a -devel package. OK
MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency. OK
MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. OK
MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. N/A
MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK
MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK
SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK
SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from
upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK
SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list