[Bug 515046] Review Request: perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree-XPath - XPath access to XML::Parser::Lite::Tree structures

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515046





--- Comment #4 from Jan Klepek <jan.klepek at hp.com>  2009-08-15 16:03:43 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Jan --
> 
> 1. I believe the artistic license version 2.0 it's OK for Fedora [1].
Did you read https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Perl?.

I don't argue about validity of artistic license for fedora, artistic license
is completely ok. 

In readme for XML::Parser::Lite::Tree::Xpath is:
"License: Perl Artistic License 2.0
This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
it under the same terms as Perl itself. "

So from this i see it is dual licensed (artistic 2.0 and same terms as perl
itself).

from:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Perl#License_tag
"Perl itself is dual licensed, under both the GPL and Artistic licenses. Many
perl modules follow this practice; when they do, the license tag should be
filled out as "GPL+ or Artistic", not the other way around."

>From this point, i don't see only "Artistic license" acceptable, there should
be "GPL+ or Artistic" to follow perl specific packaging guidelines.


> 2. I think the tests fail because of features not implemented, but I can
> confirm that with the developer. Anyway I'll check the whole test part, thank
> you.

Please check, I'm looking into this too to determine if code is broken or
functions are just not implemented at all. So far it looks like broken code for
me.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.