[Bug 506425] Review Request: lightsquid - a light, small and fast log analyzer for squid proxy
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Aug 26 06:21:37 UTC 2009
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506425
Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola at iki.fi> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi
--- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola at iki.fi> 2009-08-26 02:21:36 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> lightsquid.spec: W: no-%build-section
> --- I'm stumped at the minute
> 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 10 errors, 1 warnings.
One just needs to add an empty %build section if there is nothing to build.
reason
> lightsquid-apache.noarch: W: no-documentation
> ---I'm new to this game so not sure what initiative to take I know this error
> was ok for a package I did I assume its the same in this case
It's OK as long as there's nothing relevant to ship as the documentation, and
as long as there is no duplication between interdependent packages. For
instance
if the main package ships COPYING, the -devel package that requires the main
package doesn't need to.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list