[Bug 530090] Review Request: emacs-goodies - Miscellaneous add-ons for Emacs

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Dec 15 17:19:43 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530090





--- Comment #54 from Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de>  2009-12-15 12:19:40 EDT ---
Good:
+ SPEC basename matches with package name
+ Package contains recent release of the application
+ Consistantly usage of rpm macros
+ URL tag shows on proper project homepage
+ Could download upstream tar ball via spectool -g
+ Package tarball matches with upstream
(m5dsum: ec409b4628c2c9a4f9789cb7fb570271)
+ License tag states GPLv2+ as a valid OSS license
+ Package contains verbatin copy of the license text
+ Package contains el subpackage for emacs lisp sources
+ Subpackage contains proper Required tag agains main package
+ Local build works fine
+ Package has proper Buildroot definition
+ Buildroot will be clean at start of %clean and %install
+ Rpmlint is silent on source package
+ Rpmlint is silent on binary package
+ Mock build works fine
+ Local install/uninstall works fine
+ Application seems to work properly
+ Files has proper permission
+ All files are owned by the package
+ There are new files or dirs belong to other packages
+ %doc stanza is small, so we need no separate doc subpackage
+ Package has proper Changelog

Bad:
- I could fount GPLv3 licensed source files in the package.
  Pliease change license tag to 'GPLv2+ and GPLv3'

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list