[Bug 544869] Review Request: udunits2 - A library for manipulating units of physical quantities

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Dec 31 17:14:49 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544869


Orion Poplawski <orion at cora.nwra.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
                 CC|                            |orion at cora.nwra.com
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |orion at cora.nwra.com
               Flag|                            |fedora-review+




--- Comment #1 from Orion Poplawski <orion at cora.nwra.com>  2009-12-31 12:14:47 EDT ---
    *  rpmlint

udunits2.i686: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libudunits2.so.0.0.0
exit at GLIBC_2.0

A number to UCAR libraries do this - often only when a certain flag is set. 
Probably worth pinging upstream about though.  Not blocking the review though.

    * naming - okay
    * NamingGuidelines
    * licensing - MIT
    * osi approved? yes
    * included? yes
    * correct mentioned in specfile? yes

specfile

    * American English - yes
    * legible - yes
    * BuildRequires - good
    * Locales - NA
    * shared libraries: ldconfig - yes
    *  %clean section with rm -rf ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT} - yes
    * macros - consistent
    * sources - checksums match upstream
    * relocatable? Prefix: /usr? - NA
    * files and directories  - good
    * owns all created directories - yes
    * all files listed in %files - yes
    * permissions? - good
    * deffattr? - yes
    * no .la files - yes
     * no conflicts with other packets - checked okay with udunits
    * -devel - yes
    * headers - yes
    * static libraries - NA
    * .so without suffix when .so.suffix existent - nope
    * .pc files - NA
    * permissable content - yes
    * doc - yes
    * large doc in -doc package - NA
    * must not affect runtime - good

    * mock build - yes
    * sane scriptlets - yes
    * subpackages with fully versioned dependency - yes

Looks good.  Approved.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list