[Bug 544869] Review Request: udunits2 - A library for manipulating units of physical quantities
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Dec 31 17:14:49 UTC 2009
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544869
Orion Poplawski <orion at cora.nwra.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC| |orion at cora.nwra.com
AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |orion at cora.nwra.com
Flag| |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Orion Poplawski <orion at cora.nwra.com> 2009-12-31 12:14:47 EDT ---
* rpmlint
udunits2.i686: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libudunits2.so.0.0.0
exit at GLIBC_2.0
A number to UCAR libraries do this - often only when a certain flag is set.
Probably worth pinging upstream about though. Not blocking the review though.
* naming - okay
* NamingGuidelines
* licensing - MIT
* osi approved? yes
* included? yes
* correct mentioned in specfile? yes
specfile
* American English - yes
* legible - yes
* BuildRequires - good
* Locales - NA
* shared libraries: ldconfig - yes
* %clean section with rm -rf ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT} - yes
* macros - consistent
* sources - checksums match upstream
* relocatable? Prefix: /usr? - NA
* files and directories - good
* owns all created directories - yes
* all files listed in %files - yes
* permissions? - good
* deffattr? - yes
* no .la files - yes
* no conflicts with other packets - checked okay with udunits
* -devel - yes
* headers - yes
* static libraries - NA
* .so without suffix when .so.suffix existent - nope
* .pc files - NA
* permissable content - yes
* doc - yes
* large doc in -doc package - NA
* must not affect runtime - good
* mock build - yes
* sane scriptlets - yes
* subpackages with fully versioned dependency - yes
Looks good. Approved.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list