[Bug 225958] Merge Review: kbd

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Feb 5 19:28:41 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225958





--- Comment #4 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro>  2009-02-05 14:28:40 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> > kbd.src:20: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes console-tools
> > kbd.src:20: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes open
> > kbd.src:21: W: unversioned-explicit-provides console-tools
> > kbd.src:21: W: unversioned-explicit-provides open
> OK, Obsoletes is very historical here and it's probably safe to remove it, I'm
> just not sure about Provides... I'm not able to find good information on
> Provides/Obsoletes (if console-tools and open Provides are needed by other some
> package), what do you think?
> 
According to:
  [wolfy at wolfy tmp]$ repoquery --whatrequires open --repoid=development
  [wolfy at wolfy tmp]$ repoquery --whatrequires console-tools
--repoid=development
you can drop the Provides, too. No one seems to require them.



> > kbd.src:73: E: hardcoded-library-path in
> > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/lib/kbd/keymaps/i386/qwerty/ro_win.map.gz
> > kbd.src:76: E: hardcoded-library-path in
> > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/lib/kbd/keymaps/i386/qwerty/sr-latin.map.gz
> > kbd.src:80: E: hardcoded-library-path in
> > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/lib/kbd/keymaps/i386/qwerty/ko.map.gz
> > kbd.src:109: E: hardcoded-library-path in /lib/kbd
> We want /lib/kbd for every architecture, so I'll not change this.
OK.



> > kbd.src: W: no-url-tag
> There's no kbd homepage.
How about http://ftp.altlinux.org/pub/people/legion/kbd ?


> > At least the COPYING file from the root dir should be included as %doc. I
> > suggest to also add doc/dvorak
> I agree with COPYING, but disagree with doc/dvorak. I think people that already
> are using dvorak don't need this kind of info and others much less:)
Well, say I'd like to give Dvorak a spin and I'll use it side by side with the
normal QWERTY layout for a while. Wouldn't I need the docs? Having them on my
system might be more convenient than browsing the net for them.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list