[Bug 485893] Package Review: perl-NOCpulse-Object - NOCpulse Object abstraction for Perl

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Feb 18 00:36:49 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485893


manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review+              |fedora-review?




--- Comment #2 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro>  2009-02-17 19:36:48 EDT ---
Uhm, sorry. I take it back for a sec. Is it realy normal to overlap the
provides and the requires?

[wolfy at wolfy tmp]$ rpm -qp --provides
/home/wolfy/reports/perl-NOCpulse-Object/perl-NOCpulse-Object-1.26.9-1.fc11.noarch.rpm
perl(NOCpulse::AbstractObjectRepository)
perl(NOCpulse::BlockingDBMNamespace)
perl(NOCpulse::BlockingFileNamespace)
perl(NOCpulse::DBMObjectRepository)
perl(NOCpulse::INIObjectRepository)
perl(NOCpulse::MultiFileObjectRepository)
perl(NOCpulse::NSObject)
perl(NOCpulse::Namespace)
perl(NOCpulse::Object) = 1.26
perl(NOCpulse::ObjectProxy)
perl(NOCpulse::ObjectProxyServer)
perl(NOCpulse::PersistentObject)
perl(NOCpulse::SharedBlockingNamespace)
perl-NOCpulse-Object = 1.26.9-1.fc11

[wolfy at wolfy tmp]$ rpm -qp --requires
/home/wolfy/reports/perl-NOCpulse-Object/perl-NOCpulse-Object-1.26.9-1.fc11.noarch.rpm
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0)
perl(Carp)
perl(Config::IniFiles)
perl(Exporter)
perl(Fcntl)
perl(File::Basename)
perl(FreezeThaw)
perl(GDBM_File)
perl(IO::Dir)
perl(IO::File)
perl(NOCpulse::AbstractObjectRepository)
perl(NOCpulse::DBMObjectRepository)
perl(NOCpulse::Debug)
perl(NOCpulse::INIObjectRepository)
perl(NOCpulse::MultiFileObjectRepository)
perl(NOCpulse::Namespace)
perl(NOCpulse::Object)
perl(NOCpulse::SharedBlockingNamespace)
perl(strict)
perl(vars)
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1


Most of the requires are provided by the same package, and as far as I remember
they should be filtered. Am I wrong here?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list