[Bug 486269] Review Request: levien-inconsolata-fonts - Inconsolata fonts

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Feb 20 10:29:04 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486269


Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |kevin at tummy.com
               Flag|                            |fedora-review+




--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-20 05:29:02 EDT ---
1. a fontconfig ruleset would be nice
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#The_fontconfig_stuff_the_font_guidelines_suggest_seems_complex._Can_I_skip_it.3F

2. FPC will want you to use %global not %define soonish
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/global_preferred_over_define

3. Are you sure you want to provide the old name?
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#Do_I_need_to_Provide_my_old_package_names.3F

Anyway, nothing here is blocking

☎☎☎ APPROVED ☎☎☎

Please do not forget the other steps in

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#What_if_the_new_naming_guidelines_require_me_to_rename_my_source_package.3F

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list