[Bug 486269] Review Request: levien-inconsolata-fonts - Inconsolata fonts
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Feb 20 10:29:04 UTC 2009
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486269
Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com
Flag| |fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> 2009-02-20 05:29:02 EDT ---
1. a fontconfig ruleset would be nice
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#The_fontconfig_stuff_the_font_guidelines_suggest_seems_complex._Can_I_skip_it.3F
2. FPC will want you to use %global not %define soonish
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/global_preferred_over_define
3. Are you sure you want to provide the old name?
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#Do_I_need_to_Provide_my_old_package_names.3F
Anyway, nothing here is blocking
☎☎☎ APPROVED ☎☎☎
Please do not forget the other steps in
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#What_if_the_new_naming_guidelines_require_me_to_rename_my_source_package.3F
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list