[Bug 455226] Review Request: php-pecl-runkit - PHP Opcode Analyser

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455226





--- Comment #9 from Remi Collet <fedora at famillecollet.com>  2009-02-22 03:25:42 EDT ---
> Please, excuse me for long delay.

Not a problem, I'm also actually very busy

> No, duedlines say what CVS, not released versions must start from 0.

Definitely, I can't agree.
Version 0.9 have been published on 2006-06-06

So this is a post-release version
Read :
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Snapshot_packages

I prefer using %{name}.xml rather than %{peclName}.xml (or %{peclName}2.xml)
(see recent approved changes in PHP Guidelines, this is to avoid possible
conflicts between pecl, pear and other channel extensions).

I need to search if %verify(not md5 mtime size) is acceptable in the
Guidelines...

Is the spec encoding ok ? It seems there is UTF-8 (ru sumnary) and ISO (pl
sumnary) which make my text editor crazy ?

$ file php-pecl-runkit.spec 
php-pecl-runkit.spec: Non-ISO extended-ASCII text, with LF, NEL line
terminators

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.