[Bug 469972] Review Request: glfw - A portable framework for OpenGL

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Jan 1 16:23:39 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469972


Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |lkundrak at v3.sk




--- Comment #12 from Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk>  2009-01-01 11:23:37 EDT ---
Ping

The .so file should really go to the main package and the static library should
be eliminated, see
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exclusion_of_Static_Libraries

Ville: By the way -- is it ok for a shared library to have no soname? Without
it we can't depend on exact ABI version. Probably the right way to fix it to
persuade upstream into using a SONAME themselves (they already consider package
versions to be API versions, according to comments in source code). But anyway,
if upstream did not do that, shouldn't we just make up a soname?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list