[Bug 479763] New: Review Request: seam - The Simple Extensible Abstract Machine
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Jan 12 22:04:44 UTC 2009
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: seam - The Simple Extensible Abstract Machine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479763
Summary: Review Request: seam - The Simple Extensible Abstract
Machine
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net
QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/seam.spec
SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/seam-1.4-1.fc9.src.rpm
Project URL: http://www.ps.uni-sb.de/seam/
Description:
SEAM (Simple Extensible Abstract Machine) is a virtual machine
architecture and library. SEAM is designed to be language- and
platform-independent, to be simple and based on few principled
services.
* Uniform data representation and memory management
* Platform-independent external representation
* Abstract execution model
Koji scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1047921
rpmlint output:
[fab at laptop024 i386]$ rpmlint seam*
seam.i386: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libseam.so.0.0.0 exit at GLIBC_2.0
seam-devel.i386: W: no-documentation
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
[fab at laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint seam-1.4-1.fc9.src.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
At the moment this package is not building in 64-bit environments. ->
ExclusiveArch: %{ix86} ppc
I guess it's around the GNU Lightning support.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list