[Bug 479585] Review Request: megaupload-dl - Megaupload automatic downloader

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Jan 14 16:05:06 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479585





--- Comment #17 from Jochen Schmitt <jochen at herr-schmitt.de>  2009-01-14 11:05:05 EDT ---
Good:
+ Package name fit with nameing guidelines
+ Name of SPEC file fit with basename of package
+ Package has a valid open source license
+ Package contains verbatin copy of the license text
+ Consistently usage of macros
+ source can be downloaded via spectool
+ Tar ball in the package fits with upstreams
(md5sum: 366849faf106f4fdfb6e1ff1f72b9e9d)
* BUILDROOT will cleaned on the beginning of the %install and %clean stanza
+ Rpmlint is quiete on source rpm
+ Package contains no subpackages
+ Files containing in the package doesn't belongs to others
+ Content of %doc is small, so no separate subpackage is require
+ Package will be built on noarch
+ Local build works fine
+ Build on koji works fine
+ Local install works fine
+ Starting of application without argument works
+ Removing of the package works fine.

Bad:
- License tag should be CPLv3+ because the copyright notice
on the source files allow the usage of later version of the GPL
- Rpmlint complaints on binary rpm:
megaupload-dl.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/doc/megaupload-dl-0.2.1/megaupload_dl_wget.sh
megaupload-dl.noarch: E: non-executable-script
/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/megaupload_dl/lib.py 0644
megaupload-dl.noarch: E: non-executable-script
/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/megaupload_dl/megaupload_dl.py 0644
- Files on %{_sitedir}/metagupload_dl/*.py should be executables
- Files on %{_docdir} should be not executable
- __init__.py file should have a shebang

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list