[Bug 508483] Review Request: ewl - Enlightenment Widget Library

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sat Jul 4 03:40:30 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508483





--- Comment #2 from John Guthrie <guthrie at counterexample.org>  2009-07-03 23:40:29 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Hi John,
> 
> I was going to do a full review, however I've stumbled upon some major issues.
> Please can you solve them first before I do the complete review?
> 
> - the package contains a rather old snaphost from 1/2008 - can you package a
> newer snapshot e.g. from 6/2009?

Not done yet.  Should be finished in a couple of days.

> - rpmlint reveals 139 warnings and errors, especially:

Doh!  I think I must have run rpmlint on the specfile and then absent-mindedly
forgotten to check the RPM that I had just built.  Here is the latest output
from rpmlint:

ewl.i586: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libewl.so.1.0.0 exit at GLIBC_2.0
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
ewl-devel.i586: W: no-documentation
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.

> * formatting fo the description

Fixed

> * lots of example *.c files in the main package (they should be in the devel
> package)

Fixed.

> * static libraries were packaged - usually they should be completely omitted
> unless there is a reason:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#StaticLibraries

Fixed.

> * if the %post/%postun section only contains one line, it should be written
> like this:
> %post -p /sbin/ldconfig

Fixed.

> - using %ghost for *.so.x should not be necessary, 
> %{_libdir}/*.so.* should be sufficient

Is this true even when the file is a symlink created by the %post section.  My
thinking was that the *.so.1 files were created by the %post section, so they
should be ghosted.

> - pkgconfig must be required by the devel pacakge since *.pc is packaged

One of the automatically generated requires for the devel package is
/usr/bin/pkg-config.  Is that not sufficient?

> - probably the tests should be moved into the devel package, too
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> Christian  

I haven't posted the latest package.  I'll be posting it once I get a new
version of the software.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list