[Bug 497622] Review Request: apbs - adaptive poisson boltzmann solver

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Jul 6 21:50:15 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622





--- Comment #13 from Tim Fenn <fenn at stanford.edu>  2009-07-06 17:50:14 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> Hmm, it seems that aqua is a customized version of PMG as per
> http://cardon.wustl.edu/MediaWiki/index.php/APBS .
> 
> In that case I'm really not sure what should be done. Many possibilities come
> to mind
> 
> - package aqua separately [if it has development that is clearly separate from
> apbs]
> - create a aqua subpackage [development as part of apbs but still other apps
> might use it]
> - don't package aqua at all [an incompatible fork of the PMG library that is
> used nowhere else]  

Oh, this is getting fun.  I'll go with option 2, since Nathan seems to have
taken over the aqua development anyway. It looks like this will also be
necessary with pmgZ, as again - it seems to primarily be developed as part of
apbs, not really its own independent library. Only maloc can really be its
"own" library - Mike Holst still manages that.

Here's a shot at an rpm for pmgZ - I can't seem to find much in the way of
guidelines for subpackages in this sort of instance - should independent
package requests be made for each (with blockers added for this package)?

Spec URL: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/pmgz.spec
SRPM URL:
http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/apbs-pmgz-1.1.0-1.20090706svn1360.fc11.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list