[Bug 509798] Review Request: armv5tel-fedora-linux-gnueabi-binutils - A GNU collection of binary utilities

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509798





--- Comment #7 from Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov at gmail.com>  2009-07-07 09:28:46 EDT ---
I'm afraid, that you're wrong - no naming scheme was chosed so far (at least
they didn't do it in open manner). Moreover, I suspect that using name "redhat"
is not suitable. First - it's a trademark, second - we are building Fedora, not
the RHEL.

Actually, maybe is it better to change this part to something neutral? I did
some checks - here are valid gcc naming schemes:

i686-pc-linux-gnu (gcc for F-10, i386)
powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu (gcc for F-11, ppc)
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu (gcc for x86_64, CentOS 5)
armv5tejl-unknown-linux-gnueabi (F-10 for ARM on my arm-machine)

On the other hand, if we'll add branches for EPEL, then my naming scheme
(armv5tel-redhat-linux-gnueabi) will be improper.

I'll ask in mail-lists.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.