[Bug 510808] Review Request: pondus - A personal weight management program

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510808


Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




--- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu>  2009-07-11 02:44:42 EDT ---
Did you consider a dependency on python-matplotlib?  Without it you can't
actually plot anything, and the description probably needs to account for that.
 Also, the message printed when you don't have python-matplotlib doesn't really
help the user to figure out what package to install.  (It references
"Matplotlib", which you can search for, but it would be better if it indicated
the package name.)

I don't think that's a blocker, but do think of the users.

* source files match upstream.  sha256sum:           
   5b5dcecd570d2242663771f23d5d7679164fb04a82accf6a142b78bf485c1181
   pondus-0.5.3.tar.gz
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* summary is OK.                                                              
* description is OK.                                                          
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text included in package.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64).
* package installs properly.
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane:
   pondus = 0.5.3-1.fc12
  =
   /usr/bin/python
   python(abi) = 2.6

* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no generically named files
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* desktop files valid and installed properly.

APPROVED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.