[Bug 501385] Review Request: 389-admin-console - 389 Admin Server Management Console

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501385





--- Comment #6 from Rich Megginson <rmeggins at redhat.com>  2009-07-14 18:59:48 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Bad:
> - License tag states GPLv2 but the copyright state GPLv2+
>   as the license for the project.

Source files have been changed to use plain GPLv2.  New version 1.1.4
Spec: http://rmeggins.fedorapeople.org/pkgreview/389-admin-console.spec
SRPM:
http://rmeggins.fedorapeople.org/pkgreview/389-admin-console-1.1.4-1.src.rpm
Source: http://port389.org/sources/389-admin-console-1.1.4.tar.bz2
md5sum 389-admin-console-1.1.4.tar.bz2
55c661be949c27b9ff2f754abbc2607f  389-admin-console-1.1.4.tar.bz2
sha1sum 389-admin-console-1.1.4.tar.bz229a4ba674b4f532c67ed1303162e5b232bcf9821
 389-admin-console-1.1.4.tar.bz2

> - Why you put the jar files into %{_datadir}/dirsrv/manual/html/java?

The way the console works is that it dynamically downloads (and caches) the jar
file corresponding to the server version you are managing.  This allows you to
use the console to manage older and compatible newer versions of directory
server and admin server.  The location %{_datadir}/dirsrv/manual/html/java is
where the admin server looks for the jar files when a request is made to
download them to the console machine.

The files under %{_datadir}/dirsrv/manual/html/java are not used directly -
they are downloaded to $HOME/.fedora-idm-console (or now $HOME/.389-console)
where they are loaded into the console.

> - Because the manual seems to be very large, a separate doc
>   subpackage make sense  

Done.  See above.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.