[Bug 501573] Review Request: ndoutils - Stores data from Nagios in a database

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Jul 16 19:02:36 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501573





--- Comment #13 from Mike Bonnet <mikeb at redhat.com>  2009-07-16 15:02:34 EDT ---
rpmlint output:

$ rpmlint ndoutils-1.4-0.3.b7.fc12.x86_64.rpm
ndoutils-mysql-1.4-0.3.b7.fc12.x86_64.rpm
ndoutils-pgsql-1.4-0.3.b7.fc12.x86_64.rpm
ndoutils.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/log/ndoutils nagios
ndoutils.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/run/ndoutils nagios
ndoutils.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/cache/ndoutils nagios
ndoutils.x86_64: W: log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/ndoutils
ndoutils.x86_64: W: incoherent-init-script-name ndo2db
ndoutils-mysql.x86_64: W: no-documentation
ndoutils-pgsql.x86_64: W: no-documentation

All of them are explained satisfactorily above.

The GPLv2 license is mentioned in a few of the source files, but you may want
to encourage upstream to include a LICENSE or COPYING file in the source
tarball.

A better URL might be http://www.nagios.org/download/addons/, but I'll leave
that decision to you.

The Source0 URL should be:

Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/nagios/ndoutils-1.4b7.tar.gz

in accordance with:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Sourceforge.net

Tarball in .src.rpm matches upstream tarball.

Koji scratch build succeeded on all arches:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1480076

The %files sections for the mysql and pgsql subpackages need %defattr lines (I
don't think this changes anything, but it's in the guidelines).

It seems very odd to be dropping a .o file into %{_libdir} (rather than a
versioned .so).  Is this customary for nagios addons?  Are there other packages
that do this?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list