[Bug 512106] Review Request: rpmconf - Tool to handle rpmnew and rpmsave files

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512106





--- Comment #8 from Miroslav Suchý <msuchy at redhat.com>  2009-07-17 04:34:21 EDT ---
> BuildRoot used is archaic. Use
It was one of recommended in Guideliness. But if you insist on the most
prefered... Changed.

> I still don't see why you would want to use "/usr/bin/docbook2man" instead of
"docbook2man"
I prefer full paths as it prevent path spoofing. Just my opinion. I'm not
dogmatic about it. Changed.

> License is GPLv2 not GPLv3. (Source code header is binding.)
Since I'm upstrem, then what I want is binding :)
Changed source header to GPLv3. Mention of GPLv2 was mistake.

Update SPEC:
http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/rpmconf/rpmconf.spec
Update SRPM:
http://cloud.github.com/downloads/xsuchy/rpmconf/rpmconf-0.1.6-1.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.