[Bug 513119] Review Request: PgsLookAndFeel - Nice looking LookAndFeel for Swing

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Jul 22 11:40:39 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513119





--- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola at iki.fi>  2009-07-22 07:40:37 EDT ---
- I suggest versioning the BR: and R: on java to >= 1:1.6.0 to make sure the
project is built with openjdk, not gcj.

rpmlint output is clean.

MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a
duplicate. OK
MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used
consistently. OK
MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK
- Upstream clearly has a preference and PgsLookAndFeel is clearer than
pgslookandfeel.

MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK
MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the 
Licensing Guidelines. OK
MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license.
OK
- Some files are BSD which should be compatible with ASL 2.0.

MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL. OK
MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK
MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. N/A
MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK
MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package
that owns the directory. OK
MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK
MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. N/A
MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK
MUST: Clean section exists. OK

MUST: Java documentation must go in a -javadoc subpackage. NEEDSWORK
- Javadoc files must go into  %{_javadocdir}/%{name}.

MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect
runtime of application. OK
MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. N/A
MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK
MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK
SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK

SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from
upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. NEEDSWORK
- Ask upstream to put license and README in cvs.

SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list