[Bug 512068] Review Request: rancid - Really Awesome New Cisco confIg Differ
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Jul 23 03:27:48 UTC 2009
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512068
David Nalley <david at gnsa.us> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #17 from David Nalley <david at gnsa.us> 2009-07-22 23:27:47 EDT ---
I tend to agree with lack of telnet and rsh, but I don't think that blocks the
package, more of a preference than anything, so not within scope of the package
review.
provides and requires looks sane:
[ke4qqq at nalleyt61 i586]$ rpm -qp --provides ./rancid-2.3.2-3.fc11.i586.rpm
config(rancid) = 2.3.2-3.fc11
rancid = 2.3.2-3.fc11
rancid(x86-32) = 2.3.2-3.fc11
[ke4qqq at nalleyt61 i586]$ rpm -qp --requires ./rancid-2.3.2-3.fc11.i586.rpm
/bin/sh
/bin/sh
/usr/bin/expect
/usr/bin/perl
config(rancid) = 2.3.2-3.fc11
expect
findutils
iputils
libc.so.6
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)
libutil.so.1
libutil.so.1(GLIBC_2.0)
logrotate
perl
perl >= 1:5
perl(CGI)
perl(Getopt::Std)
perl(LockFile::Simple)
perl(Mail::Mailer)
perl(POSIX)
perl(Sys::Syslog)
perl(newgetopt.pl)
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
rtld(GNU_HASH)
shadow-utils
As you noted rpmlint still complaining about permissions - but doesn't appear
to be a blocker.
[ke4qqq at nalleyt61 i586]$ rpmlint ../../SPECS/rancid.spec
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
[ke4qqq at nalleyt61 i586]$ rpmlint ../../SRPMS/rancid-2.3.2-3.fc11.src.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
[ke4qqq at nalleyt61 i586]$ rpmlint ./rancid-2.3.2-3.fc11.i586.rpm
rancid.i586: W: non-standard-uid /etc/rancid/lg.conf rancid
rancid.i586: W: non-standard-gid /etc/rancid/lg.conf rancid
rancid.i586: E: non-readable /etc/rancid/lg.conf 0640
rancid.i586: W: non-standard-uid /etc/rancid/rancid.conf rancid
rancid.i586: W: non-standard-gid /etc/rancid/rancid.conf rancid
rancid.i586: E: non-readable /etc/rancid/rancid.conf 0640
rancid.i586: W: non-standard-uid /var/rancid rancid
rancid.i586: W: non-standard-gid /var/rancid rancid
rancid.i586: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/rancid 0750
rancid.i586: W: non-standard-uid /etc/rancid rancid
rancid.i586: W: non-standard-gid /etc/rancid rancid
rancid.i586: E: non-standard-dir-perm /etc/rancid 0750
rancid.i586: W: non-standard-uid /var/log/rancid/old rancid
rancid.i586: W: non-standard-gid /var/log/rancid/old rancid
rancid.i586: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/log/rancid/old 0750
rancid.i586: W: non-standard-uid /var/log/rancid rancid
rancid.i586: W: non-standard-gid /var/log/rancid rancid
rancid.i586: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/log/rancid 0750
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 6 errors, 12 warnings.
[ke4qqq at nalleyt61 i586]$ rpmlint ./rancid-debuginfo-2.3.2-3.fc11.i586.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
Thanks for doing the work on this.
I don't see any blockers for approving the package thus:
APPROVED
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list