[Bug 497622] Review Request: apbs - adaptive poisson boltzmann solver

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622





--- Comment #28 from Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola at iki.fi>  2009-07-24 02:47:06 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #27)
> Adding --with-arpack enables building of a "driver" binary that is part of the
> tools folder, which is just copied to the share directory in the
> install-data-local macro, so its not required for APBS.  Would it be best to
> set up a -tools subpackage with all the extras? (see here:
> http://cardon.wustl.edu/MediaWiki/index.php/An_overview_of_the_APBS_package#Other_tools_distributed_with_APBS
> for more info) And I'm also worried about having a binary just called "driver"
> lying around - could that be an issue?

Yes, "driver" is a no-go and must be renamed to e.g. abps-driver if packaged.
If it is compiled, how is it installed in the share directory..?

Actually, you'll have to rename everythin in the tools/ folder in the package.

IMHO they should be packaged, since they are included in the abps distribution.

> Adding --enable-python doesn't do anything other than build ZSI (which it
> shouldn't do) - which I realized, python-ZSI should be a requires so
> ApbsClient.py runs properly.

That's odd. After all
http://cardon.wustl.edu/MediaWiki/index.php/An_overview_of_the_APBS_package#Python_development_tools

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.