[Bug 497622] Review Request: apbs - adaptive poisson boltzmann solver
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Jul 27 01:49:18 UTC 2009
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622
--- Comment #32 from Tim Fenn <fenn at stanford.edu> 2009-07-26 21:49:16 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #31)
> (In reply to comment #30)
> > (In reply to comment #26)
> > > apbs has support for:
> > > --with-mpich=PATH toplevel MPICH directory
> > > --with-mpich2=PATH toplevel MPICH2 directory
> > > --with-lam=PATH toplevel LAM-MPI directory
> > > --with-openmpi enable OpenMPI compilation
> > > so I suggest you add these to the package in the future.
> > >
> >
> > Will do.
>
> Just no hurry - wait until the two drafts become guidelines :)
>
Right!
> > This works, but the resulting examples take ~4hrs to run on my AMD opteron 275.
> > I can cut it down to a 1-2 of the examples...
>
> Ugh. Do they give an error code if the result is not the wanted one..?
>
> You could probably just drop the %check phase.
>
There is no error code, it just prints out that the result was not within the
given error tolerance.
I just took out the %check.
>
> Package does not build:
> RPM build errors:
> File not found:
> /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/apbs-1.1.0-5.fc11.x86_64/usr/bin/ApbsClient.pyc
> File not found:
> /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/apbs-1.1.0-5.fc11.x86_64/usr/bin/ApbsClient.pyo
>
> This is due to RPM in Fedora 11 not byte compiling files in %{_bindir}. Instead
> of %exclude you could just delete the files after %install with rm -f which
> doesn't complain about possible non-existing files.
I just removed the %exclude statement and built using F11 (since I won't be
packaging this for F10 anyway).
Spec URL: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/apbs.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/apbs-1.1.0-6.fc11.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list