[Bug 503175] Review Request: perl-Crypt-GPG - Perl Object Oriented Interface to GnuPG

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503175





--- Comment #6 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade at gmail.com>  2009-06-01 11:05:49 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> The request in which you were asked to generate the missing file is somewhat
> dated - in fact it was common practice amongst the perl SIG at that time to add
> the files. However, since then the packaging guidelines have changed and now
> quite clearly state that license text should be included if and only if
> upstream includes them:
> 
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ReviewGuidelines
> 
> MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
> in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
> package must be included in %doc  

I agree here. This is one point that I see capnspec does not needed to create
manually COPYING and Artistic files.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.