[Bug 496635] Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-mdb - Mono Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Jun 8 21:10:24 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496635





--- Comment #39 from Mauricio Henriquez <buhochileno at gmail.com>  2009-06-08 17:10:23 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #37)
> Hey Mauricio,
> 
> the upstream tarball build well in mock. What have you tried and whats your
> system?
Fedora 10  2.6.27.15-170.2.24.fc10.i686, rpm tools:

rpm-4.6.0-2.fc10.i386
rpmrebuild-2.3-1.fc10.noarch
rpm-devel-4.6.0-2.fc10.i386
rpm-build-4.6.0-2.fc10.i386
rpm-apidocs-4.6.0-1.fc10.i386
rpmdevtools-7.0-1.fc10.noarch
rpm-libs-4.6.0-2.fc10.i386

 (btw, the diff between your tarball and the official one shows no
> changes at mono.debugging.backend.mdb.pc.in)
yeap, I try it again, I have to add version info (Version: 2.0) in
mono.debugging.backend.mdb.pc.in file, due to that, I only attach you the .spec
file, becouse I can't generate the src.rpm package:
rpmbuild: rpmfc.c:407: rpmfcHelper: Assertion `EVR != ((void *)0)' failed.
Aborted

I find it as a bug in rpmbuild tools, can't find the link now, To generate the
src.rpm package I need to modifie sources and since that package is not going
to have original upstream source tarbal....
> s the version of 
> To version numbers:
> Every version of your package needs an unique identifier. We use a
> [project-version]-[package-release] form, where [project-version] is the
> version of the upstream project and [package-release] the version of the
> package (which starts from 1 for each new upstream version btw)
> 
> The release number at the beginning of the spec-file should be the same as the
> latest changelog entry. Because of this I said we should take three, because
> there currently are 3 entries. We could replace them by one, then we would set
> release number to 1 again. I would support that, maybe with a text like this:
> * Thu Jun 04 2009 Mauricio Henriquez <buhochileno at gmail.com> - 2.0-1
> - Initial packaging with help by Ryan Bair
> 
> Hope this makes things clearer for you!?
dummy me!! :-) , yeap sure, have prefect sense for me now, sorry :-S, think
that this time is going to be ok..

> 
> Furthermore could we have a better package description?
>
I prefer not, that is the original upstream description that is showed in
diferent places, don't want to put some mistake in there , and is quite clear
to me actually..
> Thanks for your work!
your wellcome..
> Paul  

Mauricio

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list