[Bug 501223] Review Request: tuxmath - Educational math tutor for children

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501223


Jan Klepek <jan.klepek at hp.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




--- Comment #6 from Jan Klepek <jan.klepek at hp.com>  2009-06-10 01:55:41 EDT ---
MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the
review.
- OK
rpmlint /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/SRPMS/tuxmath-1.7.2-4.fc11.src.rpm
/home/makerpm/rpmbuild/RPMS/i586/tuxmath-1.7.2-4.fc11.i586.rpm
/home/makerpm/rpmbuild/RPMS/i586/tuxmath-debuginfo-1.7.2-4.fc11.i586.rpm
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
- OK

# MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption.
- OK

MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines
- OK

MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the
Licensing Guidelines
- OK

MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license.
- OK

MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package must be included in %doc.
- OK

MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
-OK

MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
-OK

MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
-OK

MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at
least one primary architecture.
- OK, koji build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1403044

MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture...
- OK

MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires
- OK

MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the
%find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.
-OK

MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library
files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must
call ldconfig in %post and %postun.
-OK, no shared library

MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable
- OK

MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates.
- OK

MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's
%files listings.
- OK

MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly.
- OK

MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf
%{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
- OK

MUST: Each package must consistently use macros.
- OK

MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
- OK

MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage.
- OK, no large documentation

MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime
of the application.
- OK

MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package.
- OK, no header files

MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package.
- ok, no static libraries

MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for
directory ownership and usability). 
- OK, no .pc files present

MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1),
then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel
package.
- OK, no .so library

MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} =
%{version}{release}
- OK, no devel package
MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed
in the spec if they are built.
- OK, no .la archives

MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file
- OK, desktop file present and desktop-file-install used

MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other
packages. 
- OK

MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot}
(or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). 
- OK

MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
- OK

Conclusion: APPROVED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.