[Bug 505155] Review Request: libcap-ng - An alternative posix capabilities library

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Jun 11 19:23:13 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505155


Tomas Mraz <tmraz at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




--- Comment #11 from Tomas Mraz <tmraz at redhat.com>  2009-06-11 15:23:12 EDT ---
I have only two nitpicks:

1. the script to create the new symlink is overly complicated why not do it
this way:
rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_lib}/%{name}.so
mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_libdir}
VLIBNAME=$(ls $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_lib}/%{name}.so.*.*.*)
LIBNAME=$(basename $VLIBNAME)
ln -s ../../%{_lib}/$LIBNAME $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_libdir}/%{name}.so

2. there is unnecessary / before %{_libdir} on the symlink line in %files
devel.

The rpmlint is still silent:

$ rpmlint -v libcap-ng-0.4.1-1.x86_64.rpm 
libcap-ng.x86_64: I: checking
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

$ rpmlint -v libcap-ng-debuginfo-0.4.1-1.x86_64.rpm 
libcap-ng-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

$ rpmlint -v libcap-ng-devel-0.4.1-1.x86_64.rpm 
libcap-ng-devel.x86_64: I: checking
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

$ rpmlint -v libcap-ng-0.4.1-1.src.rpm 
libcap-ng.src: I: checking
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

$ rpmlint -v libcap-ng-utils-0.4.1-1.x86_64.rpm 
libcap-ng-utils.x86_64: I: checking
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.  

The nitpicks are no showstoppers so the package is ACCEPTED.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list