[Bug 506100] Review Request: opennhrp - An NHRP implementation for Linux

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506100


Steve Traylen <steve at traylen.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |steve at traylen.net




--- Comment #1 from Steve Traylen <steve at traylen.net>  2009-06-15 14:16:42 EDT ---
Hi Charles, I cannot sponsor you but I can hopefully provide some 
useful comments: 

"libcares.so.2()(64bit)" is picked up as a dependency so "c-ares" is not
needed as a Requirement.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Explicit_Requires

There are a few rpmlint errors that look to need clearing up:

$ rpmlint ../RPMS/x86_64/opennhrp-0.10.3-3.fc11.x86_64.rpm 
opennhrp.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/man/man8/opennhrp.8.gz
opennhrp.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/man/man8/opennhrp-script.8.gz
opennhrp.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/man/man5/opennhrp.conf.5.gz
opennhrp.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/man/man8/opennhrpctl.8.gz
opennhrp.x86_64: E: executable-marked-as-config-file
/etc/opennhrp/opennhrp.conf
opennhrp.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /etc/opennhrp/opennhrp.conf
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 4 warnings.

you can details on any particular message with:

$ rpmlint -I "executable-marked-as-config-file"

 Steve

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.