[Bug 506339] Review Request: XZ Utils - LZMA Utils with newer file format

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506339





--- Comment #4 from Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta at iki.fi>  2009-06-17 12:25:05 EDT ---
I think obsoleting lzma-libs and lzma-devel is definitely premature, and
providing them is wrong and should never happen (obsoletion _only_ without
provides when the time is right to drop lzma).  xz-libs does *not* provide the
stuff in lzma-libs (liblzmadec) and xz-devel does not IIRC provide the headers
and pkgconfig file that lzma-devel does, and we have packages depending on both
in the repo, at least libarchive, never mind people's local builds against
lzma-libs/-devel.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Renaming.2Freplacing_existing_packages

Yes, "beta" should be in the release tag.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Pre-Release_packages

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.