[Bug 487296] Review Request: sssd - System Security Services Daemon

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Mar 4 14:01:23 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487296





--- Comment #4 from Martin Nagy <mnagy at redhat.com>  2009-03-04 09:01:20 EDT ---
rpmlint output:
sssd.i386: W: no-documentation
sssd.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/sssd/libsss_proxy.so
sssd.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/sssd/libsss_ldap.so

Can you please comment on these?

%files section:
%{_sharedstatedir}/sss/ expands to /usr/com/sss/ which doesn't exist. I think
you meant %{_localstatedir}/%{_lib}/sss/

Additionally, I think the %{sssd_release} and %{sssd_version} macros aren't
really useful. Please consider using standard macros.

Please take a look at the following MUST and SHOULD items:
MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the
Licensing Guidelines.
- according to the Licensing Guidelines, "In addition, the package must contain
a comment explaining the multiple licensing breakdown.", please see section
1.2.9
MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no
upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL
Guidelines for how to deal with this.
MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library
files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must
call ldconfig in %post and %postun.
MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1),
then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel
package.
SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.

I have some problems with mock, so I will try building the package in mock
later.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list