[Bug 473037] Review Request: tinycc - Tiny C Compiler

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473037





--- Comment #17 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu>  2009-03-13 14:24:21 EDT ---
> I do not see why this would be bad here and ok with gcc?
> tinycc-devel.i386: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib

Well, rpm -ql gcc and look at what gcc puts into /usr/lib/gcc (even on x86_64,
interestingly).  All sorts of object files and libraries, along with some
headers.  Look at what this package puts into /usr/lib/tcc: Some header files. 
Hence the question about whether they are arch-dependent and whether they would
be better in /usr/share.  I don't think it's a huge issue, but the question was
worth asking.  If you believe the files are arch specific (or would be if this
worked on anything other than i386) then I think the files are OK where they
are.

As for the selinux issue, please ask fedora-selinux-list for guidance.  You may
be able to get some help there.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.