[Bug 167525] Review Request: cpptasks

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sat Mar 14 03:06:57 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=167525


D Haley <mycae at yahoo.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |mycae at yahoo.com




--- Comment #5 from D Haley <mycae at yahoo.com>  2009-03-13 23:06:55 EDT ---
Spec URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/cpptasks.spec
SRPM URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/cpptasks-1.0b5-1.fc10.src.rpm

rpmlint output:
$ rpmlint cpptasks.spec ../SRPMS/cpptasks-1.0b5-1.fc10.src.rpm
../RPMS/noarch/cpptasks-1.0b5-1.fc10.noarch.rpm
../RPMS/noarch/cpptasks-javadoc-1.0b5-1.fc10.noarch.rpm 
3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

koji scratch builds:
F10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1241040
F9: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1241048

Changelog:
* Sat Mar 14 2009 D Haley <mycae at yahoo.com> - 1.0b5-1
- Update to b5
- cpptasks now uses difficult mvn-doxia xdoc, so remove manual subpackage
- Add distribution jar check
- EOL conversion on NOTICE
- Change summary & format description
- Fix BuildRoot
- Change licence to ASL 2.0 from Apache Software Licence 2.0


Comments/issues:
I have removed the manual sub-package, as the project now uses maven-doxia. I
tried to get this to build, but even with upgrading my commons-cli to testing
(bug 453018) and modifying their POM, I was unable to get mvn-jpp to actually
build the "site" target (lifecycle phase, whatever). I don't see this as
totally detrimental as you can access their documentation on their website
anyway, all the "site" target does is rebuild that as a local copy.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list