[Bug 489803] Review Request: libserial - C++ library to access serial ports on POSIX systems

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Mar 16 01:51:46 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489803





--- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com>  2009-03-15 21:51:45 EDT ---
OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines
OK - Spec file matches base package name. 
OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. 
OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. 
See below - License
See below - License field in spec matches
See below - License file included in package
OK - Spec in American English
OK - Spec is legible.
OK - Sources match upstream md5sum:
7a3766e354c31513ff6d7859a4b2c1b8  libserial-0.5.2.tar.gz
7a3766e354c31513ff6d7859a4b2c1b8  libserial-0.5.2.tar.gz.orig
OK - BuildRequires correct
OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. 
OK - Package has a correct %clean section. 
OK - Package has correct buildroot
OK - Package is code or permissible content. 
OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. 
OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install

OK - Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage. 
OK - Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun
OK - .so files in -devel subpackage.
OK - -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
OK - .la files are removed. 

OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. 
OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. 
OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. 
OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. 
OK - Package obey's FHS standard (except for 2 exceptions)
OK - No rpmlint output. 
OK - final provides and requires are sane.

SHOULD Items:

OK - Should build in mock. 
OK - Should build on all supported archs
OK - Should have dist tag

Issues: 

1. It's not entirely clear what the license should be here. ;) 
Some of the source files have: 
"Copyright: See COPYING file that comes with this distribution"
which in fedora implies the License tag should be "GPL+"
SerialPort.cpp and SerialPort.h say GPLv2+

It's probibly best to talk to upstream and add a header to all the 
source files with their intended license. 

2. Non blocker, but there are some doxygen warnings you might 
want to mention to upsteam: 

Warning: Tag `CGI_NAME' at line 573 of file doxygen.conf has become obsolete.
To avoid this warning please update your configuration file using "doxygen -u"
...(and a few more)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list