[Bug 476398] Review Request: eclib - A Library for Doing Computations on Elliptic Curves

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476398





--- Comment #21 from Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael at gmx.net>  2009-03-19 16:09:36 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=335928)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=335928)
spec patch for check section

Great, one of the tests fails even. :)  If upstream cannot reproduce it by
running "spkg-check" manually, it would be Fedora-specific.


> Except you don't require the main package if one doesn't exist.
> It's not obvious.

That's splitting-hairs. You could apply your weird theory to every package and
move even applications into -devel packages. *This* package builds shared
libraries, which are used at run-time. A -devel package, on the contrary, is
fully optional. A run-time package must not depend on a -devel package.


> That's a comma. It's there to separate two ideas.

Doesn't matter, you moved the shared libs actually. That breaks the package
badly already. It's a blocker during review. Shared libs in wrong path, no
ldconfig scriptlets either.


> They can be moved back if you like.

It will be required for this package to pass review.


> it's easy enough to adjust search path at build time for static libs.

Why exactly do you move them to a non-standard location?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.