[Bug 226376] Merge Review: rootfiles
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Mar 23 14:20:25 UTC 2009
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226376
Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola at iki.fi> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED
Resolution| |RAWHIDE
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola at iki.fi> 2009-03-23 10:20:08 EDT ---
Review:
X source files match upstream (we are upstream)
X package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
X specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
X dist tag is present.
X build root is correct.
X license field matches the actual license.
X license is open source-compatible.
X license text not included upstream.
X latest version is being packaged.
X BuildRequires are proper.
X compiler flags are appropriate.
X %clean is present.
X package builds in mock.
X package installs properly.
X debuginfo package looks complete.
X rpmlint is silent.
? final provides and requires are sane:
* Is ncurses really necessary??
X no check available
X no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
X owns the directories it creates.
X doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
X no duplicates in %files.
X file permissions are appropriate.
X no scriptlets present.
X code, not content.
X documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
X %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
X no headers.
X no pkgconfig files.
X no libtool .la droppings.
X no desktop files
I don't think the ncurses requirement should be there, since the bug only
affects older distributions. Maybe add a conditional for older distros that are
affected by the bug? On the other hand, this would make the spec unnecessarily
complicated.
In any case, add a note about the ncurses requirement so that it may be dropped
in the future.
****
The package has been found to adhere to the guidelines and is thus
APPROVED
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list