[Bug 491694] Review Request: Anyterm - Web based terminal emulator

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Mar 24 00:07:22 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491694





--- Comment #5 from Mohammed Morsi <mmorsi at redhat.com>  2009-03-23 20:07:04 EDT ---
Uploaded new versions of the spec and srpm. Changes included:
* license is now GPLv2+
* gcc-c++ removed
* %{?_smp_mflags} added
* correct user/group management, using getent and not deleting them on
uninstall

Changes ommitted:
* boost still included, not sure whether you were referring to the boost req or
boost-devel buildreq (or both) and if they actually will be pulled in
(preliminary googling it reveals many specs w/ that req included, are they
erroneous?)
* source0 location, essentially I checked out the code from the anyterm svn
repo trunk, added the spec, init and sysconfig scripts, made a few changes to
the code base, and then generated / submitted the srpm and spec here. I'm not
sure how exactly my changes, specifically the new files I added and the changes
to the code will be available and make my way into the codebase when listing
the hosted anyterm release tarball

Appreciate the help

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list