[Bug 466737] Review Request: matio - Library for reading/writing Matlab MAT files

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466737


Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|needinfo?(kwizart at gmail.com |
                   |)                           |




--- Comment #19 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart at gmail.com>  2009-03-31 19:11:18 EDT ---

There is no reviewer at this time, so there I've no one to talk to.

The spec if readable as it is:
-doc are disabled because they are rundantant. (That's written within the spec
file already).
-Patching libtool remains needed as prevention to rpath, they is no need to
disable.
-zlib 1.2.3 remains documented as future introduction to EL-5 branch.
(strangely, some wants more spec's comments, others want important comment's
removed)

I agree to change some trivial issue with default_patch_fuzz removed, libmatio
> matio in desc, and typo in Group of the test sub-package.

Futhermore one patch was adopted upstream.
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2507202&group_id=176643&atid=878064
Other work is awaited because of this review is stalled.

If someone want to review this package, I will move to action, until then,
please review the pre-reviewer's comments.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.