[Bug 498723] Review Request: eZ Publish

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu May 21 12:39:16 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498723


Jon Ciesla <limb at jcomserv.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |limb at jcomserv.net




--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla <limb at jcomserv.net>  2009-05-21 08:39:15 EDT ---
Minor quibble, 

[-]  MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary
     rpms on at least one primary architecture. [7]

php no binary build.

What is meant here is the product RPM as opposed to SRPM, not binary executable
as opposed to script.  Essentially, rpmbuild -ba foo.spec must produce
something in ../RPMS/*/.

FYI. :)

Also, for the Requires, if any of those pear packages exist in Fedora as RPMS,
they should be Required.  If not, and this software needs them, they need to be
packaged and included in Fedora before this can be.  I see that this has a
blocking bug, so maybe that's going on, I didn't dig that far.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list