[Bug 478930] Review Request: globus-rls-client - Globus Toolkit - Replica Location Service Client
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun May 31 18:07:16 UTC 2009
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478930
Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC| |oget.fedora at gmail.com
AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |oget.fedora at gmail.com
Flag| |fedora-review?
Bug 478930 depends on bug 467237, which changed state.
Bug 467237 Summary: Review Request: globus-gssapi-gsi - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467237
What |Old Value |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE
Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED
--- Comment #3 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> 2009-05-31 14:07:14 EDT ---
There are some issues with this one:
- koji rawhide build seems fine
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1385823
! The file CHANGELOG can go to a %doc
* The source extraction guide is incomplete. The original source tree contains
a ./java directory, which is missing from your tarball. Is there a reason?
? There is some html documentation under the ./Doc directory. Currently there
is a doxygen documentation in the doc package which seemed to me rather
useless. Shall we replace it with the html documentation from the ./Doc
directory?
- rpmlint
globus-rls-client-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
can be ignored. (Well, the CHANGELOG might fit in here)
* Please fix the compilation warnings of the type
rpc.c:395: warning: format '%d' expects type 'int', but argument 3 has type
'globus_size_t'
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list