[Bug 498218] Review Request: picturetile - Tiles a bunch of images into one large "photo wall"

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Nov 12 18:50:42 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498218





--- Comment #14 from Edwin ten Brink <fedora at tenbrink-bekkers.nl>  2009-11-12 13:50:41 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> (In reply to comment #9)
> > (In reply to comment #8)
> > > 
> > > > ? I am a bit reluctant about the provides:
> > > >    Provides:       picturetile.pl = 20050314
> > > > Do we really need this?
> > > 
> > > ? No, not really. I just added it in case someone decides to make a 
> > > Requires in fspot. I can drop this without any adverse effects, should I?
> > > 
> > 
> > I would say, drop it. One RPM package providing two different versions of the
> > same thing might confuse people or depsolvers.
> > 
> 
> I realized that what I said is not true, since the package name is not
> "picturetile.pl". So having that Provides is harmless. I don't know if it
> brings us anything though.
> 
> I leave it up to you.  

I'll leave it in, in order to make it easier for users to find this package.
The typical use-case would be following:

- user installs f-spot
- user downloads additional extension PictureTile via fspot's Add-In manager
- user runs Tools -> Create Photowall
- user receives error message "picturetile.pl not found"
- user tries to find "picturetile.pl", not "picturetile"

Including the Provides makes it easier for rpmfind and the likes to serve this
use-case.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list