[Bug 517743] Review Request: PyPE - Lightweight but powerful graphical editor for developers
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun Nov 15 17:46:01 UTC 2009
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517743
Thomas Spura <tomspur at fedoraproject.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC| |tomspur at fedoraproject.org
AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tomspur at fedoraproject.org
Flag| |fedora-review?
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Spura <tomspur at fedoraproject.org> 2009-11-15 12:45:59 EDT ---
Review:
OK
- rpmlint is clean
- .desktop file ok for fedora, for RHEL see issues
- no missing BR
- no locales
- owns all dirctories, it should
- no duplicate files
- permissions ok
- %clean ok
- constantly macros
- nothing in %doc for runtime
- no subpackages needed
- latest version packaged
- sources match upstream
both f286464ad703c3cceec2331a01d88971
Issues:
- .desktop file needs Encoding=UTF-8 if you want to ship this into RHEL.
(at least desktop-file-validate fails without this, desktop-file-install
probably too) Just for fedora, this is not needed.
- install: the icons are in the wrong place. When starting pype searchs in
the python_site_packages_dir. Please install them into:
/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/PyPE/icons/ and adjust the desktop file or
place a link into the other icons directory.
- License GPLv2 and LGPLv2 and wxWidgets is partly wrong, partly unknown:
At least plugins/exparse.py is LGPLv2+. The other files (I checked for now)
contained no license header so you don't know, if it should be (L)GPLv2 ONLY
or v2+. Please query upstream to add license headers and ask them, if v2 only
of v2+.
- %doc: changelog is missing
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list