[Bug 540034] Review Request: lxdm - Lightweight X11 Display Manager

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun Nov 22 01:56:43 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540034


Thomas Spura <tomspur at fedoraproject.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
               Flag|                            |fedora-review+




--- Comment #1 from Thomas Spura <tomspur at fedoraproject.org>  2009-11-21 20:56:42 EDT ---
Review:

Good:
- sources generated as described: made a diff -r
  diff -r was not completely empty, some diffs in .svn
  If you'd have done tar ... --exclude=.svn ... this would be gone.
  (and a smaler package)
- rpmlint ok as described
- (version) naming according guidelines
- Group ok
- buildroot ok
- macros everywhere
- parallel builds enabled
- permissions are ok
- %files section is good, bad to look add, because of many %ghost and %config,
but no packager fault
- BR and R ok
- nothing from %doc is required


Needswork:
- There is a GPLv3 COPYING, but some files contain GPLv2+ headers, other
contain nothing at all. So some files are GPLv3 and others are GPLv2+. Probably
they want to have anything GPLv2+. But for now, till this issue is resolved,
you need to use GPLv3...

Approving this, if you change it to GPLv3.

______________________

APPROVED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list