[Bug 526738] Review Request: py-radix - Radix tree data structure for Python
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Oct 12 17:50:58 UTC 2009
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526738
--- Comment #10 from Steve Traylen <steve.traylen at cern.ch> 2009-10-12 13:50:57 EDT ---
rpmlint clean:
$ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/py-radix-* \
SRPMS/py-radix-0.5-4.fc11.src.rpm \
SPECS/py-radix.spec
3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
key:
+ okay
- problem
? notchecked.
Hi Matt,
+ rpmlint okay:
3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
+ Package name same as upstream tar ball.
+ Spec file called py-radix correctly.
+ License is BSD + advertising.
+ Spec file license correct.
+ License file is present and included.
+ Spec file is English and legible.
+ md5sum: URL and contained tar ball have same md5sum.
$ md5sum py-radix-0.5.tar.gz ../SOURCES/py-radix-0.5.tar.gz
8c853ce312b769de627d958a1cd6e5a0 py-radix-0.5.tar.gz
8c853ce312b769de627d958a1cd6e5a0 ../SOURCES/py-radix-0.5.tar.gz
+ Builds fine mock x86_64 devel
- Includes own copy of inet_top?
+ No static libs or .la files.
+ No devel packages.
+ %doc files are not needed at runtime.
+ Package owns its own directories or depends upon relavent packages.
+ All files are utf8.
Just one question about inet_top.c
This looks to be kind of standard and nothing special to this package
Its not available as part of another package or anything?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list