[Bug 496133] Review Request: EMBOSS - The European Molecular Biology Open Software Suite

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Oct 13 22:52:14 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496133


Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <rpm at greysector.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|                            |fedora-review+




--- Comment #14 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <rpm at greysector.net>  2009-10-13 18:52:12 EDT ---
Builds fine in mock/F-10/x86_64

$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-10-x86_64/result
EMBOSS-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
EMBOSS.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/profile.d/emboss.sh
EMBOSS.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/profile.d/emboss.csh
EMBOSS-libs.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libeplplot.so.3.2.7
exit at GLIBC_2.2.5
EMBOSS-libs.x86_64: W: no-documentation
5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings.

According to licensecheck from rpmdevtools, files in
scripts/
plplot/
ajax/
and some files in jemboss/ are missing licensing information. Please upstream
to add appropriate license headers to these files.

MD5 checksum OK:
6c5163c571bc0be94d64420ce0d71824  EMBOSS-6.1.0.tar.gz

Please add comments explaining the purpose of each patch and if it has been
sent upstream.

Other than that, this package looks fine and is APPROVED. Thanks for your hard
work.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list