[Bug 516520] Review Request: globus-data-conversion - Globus Toolkit - Data Conversion

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Oct 14 20:28:09 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516520


Steve Traylen <steve.traylen at cern.ch> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
                 CC|                            |steve.traylen at cern.ch
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |steve.traylen at cern.ch
               Flag|                            |fedora-review+




--- Comment #1 from Steve Traylen <steve.traylen at cern.ch>  2009-10-14 16:28:08 EDT ---
Review of globus-data-conversion:

koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1746665

MUST:

yes: 
$ rpmlint globus-data-conversion.spec
../SRPMS/globus-data-conversion-2.1-1.fc11.src.rpm
../RPMS/x86_64/globus-data-conversion-*
globus-data-conversion-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.

which is fine.

yes: Package name - globus guidelines
yes: Spec File name - globus guidelines
yes: Packaging guidelines
yes: Apache 2.0
yes: .spec ASL 2.0
yes: GLOBUS_LICENSE included.
yes: american english.
yes: Upstream source matches.

$ diff -r --brief
gt4.2.1-all-source-installer/source-trees/data_conversion/source
~/rpmbuild/SOURCES/globus_data_conversion-2.1
Only in /home/steve/rpmbuild/SOURCES/globus_data_conversion-2.1: GLOBUS_LICENSE

which is expected.

yes: builds as per koji build above.
yes: locales not present.
yes: Calls ldconfig appropriate
yes: No system libs included.
yes: not relocatable.
yes: All files and directories created in the package are owned.
yes: files not listed twice.
yes: defattr used everywhere.
yes: Buildroot is removed in %clean.
yes: consistant macros
yes: no large docs.
yes: docs not needed runtime.
yes: headers in -devel file.
yes: libs correctly in -devel package.
yes: main package is needed by devel package.
yes: no .la files present.
yes: no gui.
yes: does not own files belonging to other packages.
yes: buildroot removed in %install.
yes: utf8

APPROVED 

Steve

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list