[Bug 529105] New: Review Request: netperf - Network benchmarking tools

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: netperf - Network benchmarking tools

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529105

           Summary: Review Request: netperf - Network benchmarking tools
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: medium
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: pcfe at redhat.com
         QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
                CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
    Classification: Fedora
    Target Release: ---


Spec URL: http://pcfe.fedorapeople.org/netperf.spec
SRPM URL: http://pcfe.fedorapeople.org/netperf-4.0.0-0.rc2.1.fc11.src.rpm
Description: netperf4 being GPL2+ (as opposed to netperf2) and needing this for
testing, I decided that I might as well package it up.

But, I definitely would like some more eyeballs on the spec, especially

W: configure-without-libdir-spec
  is that acceptable with this package?

W: shared-lib-calls-exit ...
  are these acceptable considering the libraries are only used by netperf?

2 zero length documentation files
  should I exclude them from %doc (as I did with NEWS) or leave them in?
Especially examples/TBD seems to be there explicitly to show more examples
should be coming from upstream

Is the breakup between netperf and netperf-devel OK?

Plus anything else I may have missed.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.